How clever leveraging of the rightwing US backlash may decimate the $Trillion Health Corruption Fraud

on February 9, 2025 by A Midwestern Doctor (shared with thanks) via thefreeonline at https://wp.me/pIJl9-G0w

Subscribe to A Midwestern Doctor’s Substack (has free option)t¡.

How the System Continually Manipulates Us and How We Can Now Overcome It

This article originally appeared on The Forgotten Side of Medicine 

Over the last year and a half, I’ve been doing all that I can to push RFK Jr.’s candidacy along. This was essentially because:

• From both mutual friends who know him personally and my own interactions with him, I know that RFK Jr. is sincerely dedicated to advancing the issues I believe are important and hence unlikely to sell-out to the pharmaceutical industry (whereas the majority of politicians who campaign on populist issues inevitably do so once they are in a position where they can threaten the system).

• A variety of extremely unusual political factors (I described in detail here) coalesced to make what RFK Jr. and the Make America Healthy Again movement were doing suddenly possible—while in contrast, for decades, anything like what we’re witnessing now had simply been impossible (and due to the rapid proliferation global censorship from COVID-19, rapidly becoming increasingly impossible).

• A very small window existed to make the critical changes in medicine we needed, and I felt it was quite likely that this window would close, and if that happened, it would be a long time before a similar opportunity presented itself. Since the abuses of the medical industry keep on increasing, that meant if this window was missed, a lot of people would be severely harmed before the next opportunity to fix things emerged (assuming it even did).

Fortunately, a few miracles happened over the last week, and it appears that RFK Jr. is on his way to becoming the Secretary of Health and Human Services (H.H.S.). From watching that process unfold, I realized there were a few critical points that need be understood as we move forward into the next stage of healing America’s health.

Note: the Secretary of H.H.S. is typically considered to be one of the most important cabinet positions, as in addition to overseeing roughly a quarter of the Federal budget, roughly half of our health related laws have provisions that leave their implementation to the discretion of the Secretary of H.H.S. This is a major reason why the healthcare lobby (e.g., pharmaceutical companies, hospitals and insurance companies) is considered to be the most powerful lobby in Washington and why so much was invested into stopping RFK’s nomination.

Manipulating the Public

When I was in middle school (due to the boys around me entering puberty) I quickly became acutely aware of the common tricks children would use to manipulate others to get what they want, and before long, noticed that many adults were doing the same things, and then that the media was as well (which I later realized indicated they were copying each other).

This rapidly became immensely frustrating for me as I began to see how frequently the media would lie to people, the people around me would then believe it, and that it was often impossible to change their minds regardless of what I said.

To sublimate my frustration, I decided to start seeing if could predict what would happen in the future based on how the things were being portrayed in the present by the media, and before long, patterns started to repeat and the nature of the propaganda we were being exposed to indeed made it possible to predict what its end goal would be (that typically came to fruition).

As I was on this journey, I learned of the concept of “Public Relations” (PR) which forever reshaped my world view. Briefly, PR was a social science created by Freud’s nephew that combined psychology, marketing and propaganda to heavily influence the population in order to shift societal viewpoints in a favorable way for a client (e.g., get women to smoke at a time what that was socially unacceptable, make Americans want to go to war, stopping being mad at a company for causing an environmental disaster, continuing to support an abhorrent leader, convincing the populace to support a policy that goes against their own interests, etc.).

In turn, it is truly remarkable (once you investigate it) how many deeply ingrained beliefs within our society originated from a PR firm being commissioned to instill the belief, and much of what I do here is aimed at dispelling the false beliefs that destroy our health.

Likewise, it is immensely tragic that PR has transformed Democracy from being a form of government where policies are decided on the basis of how palatable they are to the electorate to one where they’re decided on the basis of how much the PR campaign to get the public behind them will cost.

For example, the 2021-2022 spike in the below graph was in part due to the over-the-top campaign we were bombarded with to badger the public into taking experimental “vaccine” gene therapies many were being harmed or killed by.

Sadly, because PR works, as the years have gone by, more and more has been invested into this invisible industry, and the techniques have become increasingly refined and widespread. In turn, once you learn to recognize those tactics, your perception of reality complete changes (in a manner analogous to putting on the glasses from the 1988 cult classic “They Live” which allowed the wearer to see how invisible aliens were secretly manipulating every facet of society).

As such, I find it both immensely valuable to understand the PR industry’s tactics and simultaneously immensely frustrating that those tactics (at least until recently) always worked.

Some of these tactics include:

• Paying focus groups to identify which sculpted messages can emotionally draw the listener to the desired position (which is why you frequently hear “odd” phrases be continually repeated).

• Monopolizing every mass media platform (including medical journals) so that the targeted messages (and no competing narrative) will be heard by everyone, and then blasting it out across those channels at the optimal time.

• Providing fake “news programs” to media stations (especially underfunded local news stations) which are made to look like legitimate news programs but are actually part of a PR campaign.

• Using a variety of “credible” third parties (discussed further here) to promote your client’s message (e.g., paid-off “experts” or “non-profits” with misleading names that imply they are opposed to the industry that’s actually funding them).

• Using a variety of compelling gimmicks (often incorporating the previous three methods) to create a viral story that sweeps the country.

Sadly, this just touches the surface of what this industry does, and for that reason, I highly advise reading this book, or watching this video (which is an abridged version of the book and was named after a PR campaign that convinced the public it was a good idea to put toxic sewage sludge on farmland and thus into our food):

In the case of RFK Jr., I suspected a targeted PR campaign would be launched against him once his H.H.S. nomination was announced, but what I did not expect was for a Left-Wing dark money group (a “non-profit” that is able to hide its industry funding) would publicly announce a campaign against RFK Jr. (likely to solicit more funding), after which a Right-Wing dark money group (led by Mike Pence) would do the same.

However, once this happened, I expected to see all the familiar PR tactics be leveled against RFK, the most remarkable of which was RFK Jr. being attacked for being both too “pro-choice” and too “pro-life” (in an effort to take away both Republican and Democrat RFK supporters).

(Note: it’s important to remember that the pharmaceutical industry becomes quite vicious when its revenue is threatened and (until recently) could overturn even the most justifiable challenges to its business.

For example, methamphetamine production has been immensely damaging for many parts of America (e.g., roughly 4% of Americans have an amphetamine use disorder, overdoses now kill over 30,000 Americans a year, parental methamphetamine has become a leading reason children are put into foster care and in numerous states cleaning up toxic meth labs have overwhelmed law enforcement). Much of this arose from it becoming possible to easily synthesize meth at home from pseudoephedrine (one of many cough medicines), so legislators in hard hit states sought to stop this by placing limits on how much pseudoephedrine could be purchased over the counter.

However, as this (eye-opening) 2013 article details, since amphetamine production created millions of pseudoephedrine sales, the pharmaceutical industry (behaving like an angry hornet’s nest) mobilized massive campaigns to shoot down every state attempt to limit purchasing it—despite it being well-established restricting pseudoephedrine sales directly reduced methamphetamine catastrophes in communities. As such, despite many attempts to enact these laws, only a few were ever able to pass.)

Framing a Debate

One of the most common methods used to manipulate people and win arguments is to present them within a context (frame) where only the desired point can be “true.”

For example, one technique the media will use to discredit their target is to have (often false) insinuations of domestic abuse float into the cultural gossip, and then ask the target not “Did you beat your wife” but rather “Do you enjoy beating your wife,” as that leading question exists within a frame where the allegations are a now an indisputable truth and hence much harder to effectively rebuke (as many of the replies one can give to that question will make them sound “guilty”).

How a Nobel Prize winning anti viral drug was sidelined to allow the Covid Vaccines Emergency Use Permission by the FDA, causing millions of deaths worldwide.

Likewise, we frequently will be presented with unreasonable demands by manipulative individuals where extensive work is done by them to create a frame where the demands seem plausible, and then two choices will be given which both reinforce the frame that individual wants.

For example, you could repeatedly be pressured into acknowledging a monetary debt you don’t actually have (in such a manner that it is difficult to argue against it due to the pushback you will receive) and then be told you have two choices to address the debt (one of which is worse than the other), at which point the frame succeeds in its underlying goal, getting you to pay a debt you never owed in the first place (assuming you “choose” the less bad choice given to you).

Continue reading “How clever leveraging of the rightwing US backlash may decimate the $Trillion Health Corruption Fraud”

A summary of the evidence against the COVID vaccines – Steve Kirsch

I can now finally prove, using gold-standard record-level data, that both mRNA shots increased all-cause mortality and that other brands were worse.

by Steve Kirsch at kirschsubstack on 20th November 2024 via thefreeonline Telegramt.me/thefreeonline

What is evidence-based practice?

Here’s a quick summary of the key pieces of evidence that taken together show that the COVID vaccines are unsafe and that the medical community should not be trusted.

Fist a short list of some of my other favorite pieces of evidence that are consistent with the vaccines are unsafe and cannot be explained otherwise:

  1. The shortest “proof” of the lack of any benefits and impact on mortality is in this article: The COVID vaccine: all risk, no benefit
  2. They cannot explain any of the 100% verifiable anecdotes like what Jay Bonnar passively observed. Probability of this happening by chance: 5.6e-22. There is only one explanation, isn’t there?
  3. The stats of Ed Dowd’s book (499 out of 500 were vaccinated when it should have been only around 75%. Probability of this happening if the vaccines were safe: 6.1e-10
  4. VAERS mortality and injury reports are more than all vaccines combined
  5. Papers published in the medical literature especially the paper on cause of death after vaccines by Peter McCullough
  6. All the vaccine injured, disabled, and dead including my friends.
  7. The unprecedented number of athletes dropping or dead
  8. What happened at Apple Valley village where deaths climbed 8X immediately after the vaccine rollout
  9. What happened at Tidewater Family Practice went from 8 to 10 deaths per year to 48 deaths per year with all the excess deaths ascribed to the COVID vaccine
  10. The lack of success stories from any nursing home
  11. The US Nursing home data
  12. the JAMA study showing COVID vaccines do not reduce hospitalization risk at all.
  13. Del Bigtree: “No safety trial was ever properly done on any of the vaccines. There is no post-licensure safety trials being done. They’re only asking for the funding now. Now you know that whether vaccines are safe or not is an absolute guess.
  14. The 19” clots pulled from vaccinated people. The embalmer says, “I never seen clotting like this prior to 2021! The first 20 years in my field, I don’t ever recall seeing clots like this. I’m not the only embalmer seeing this.”

Here’s a list of over 50 pieces of evidence. You decide which column to put each of these in:

  1. Toxic shot: This is a book co-authored by one of the top epidemiologists in the US, Yale Professor Harvey Risch. From the description of the book: “From 2021–2023, the United States alone suffered 600,000 unexplained excess deaths not associated with COVID-19…”
  2. Doctors are told to trust the FDA and CDC when prescribing vaccines. All the post-marketing safety data is kept hidden by health authorities so not even doctors can look at the data themselves to find out if any vaccine is safe. Doctors thus have no choice but to trust the authorities since the data is kept secret. They are essentially told: “do what we tell you to do, do not question authority or we will take away your license.” Note: By data, I am referring to the patient record level data. This could be easily disclosed by the health authorities without violating anyone’s confidentiality (as I proved with the New Zealand record level data) but it never is.
  3. The CDC itself doesn’t have the data to make a post-marketing independent vaccine safety assessment and they are not interested in obtaining the data either! The CDC relies on the FDA who relies on the manufacturer to test the product. The CDC could ask states for vaccination records tied to death records, but they don’t want to even ask because if they did a safety analysis, it could be discovered in a FOIA request. The CDC basically has no interest whatsoever in verifying what the actual safety data is. When I offered to show them the NZ data before I published it (so they would finally have record level data), they declined to look at it. The CDC takes basically a “head in the sand approach.” I went to CDC headquarters and spoke face to face with the director of media relations. I asked him why they don’t ask the states for the information and he said they don’t have the authority to do so. I asked, “Have you tried saying please?” He repeated his earlier statement.
  4. Lack of transparency by health authorities. Not a single health authority anywhere in the world has ever released anonymized record-level patient data for independent researchers to assess the safety of any vaccine. There isn’t any paper in a peer-reviewed journal showing that health outcomes are improved if public health data is kept secret. So why keep it secret? I proved that the record level data (which is “gold-standard” ground truth) can be anonymized and disclosed without harming anyone. While record-level patient data would be the most definitive, a detailed time-series cohort analyses can be easily produced by health authorities and published for everyone to see. These would show safety signals and do not jeopardize patient privacy. These are always kept hidden. The lone exception is the UK ONS, but they made their “buckets” so large that you cannot see the impact of the vaccine. When I asked them to redo their analysis with smaller buckets, they stopped responding to me. So I haven’t found a single health authority who wants to find out if the vaccines are safe. They all want to trust others and they all refuse to analyze their own data. This is not confidence inspiring.
  5. Lack of interest in data transparency by the medical community, media, lawmakers, and public officials. There are only a few examples of people in the medical community, mainstream media, or public officials who have called for data transparency of public health data. The rest of them prefer to keep the public in the dark. MP Andrew Bridgen in the UK has. MP Philip Davies has (see part in bold):

When asked for more detailed analysis, the authorities refuse to provide it. Seven members of Parliament requested the UK ONS to re-do an analysis with with a more detailed parameter so we could finally determine whether or not the vaccines were safe. The head of the UK ONS denied the request falsely claiming that the request would reveal PII and would not provide any new insights.

Continue reading “A summary of the evidence against the COVID vaccines – Steve Kirsch”

WATCH: ” Whistleblower Uncovers Covid Scam” + 175 Comments

by Off-Guardian on 16th November 2024 via thefreeonline at https://wp.me/pIJl9-EIB Telegram t.me/thefreeonline

The documents, provided by an anonymous whistleblower, don’t tell us anything we didn’t already know about the “pandemic”, but they do provide potentially interesting insights into the role ministerial in-fighting and institutional politicking may have played, as well as further confirmation of important facts, including:

  • Original expectation were that a vaccine would take years
  • The vaccine manufacturers skipped phase 3 trials
  • Vaccines did not prevent transmission
  • Officials knew this and lied about it to promote vaccine mandates
  • AstraZeneca’s shot was known to be potentially dangerous and promoted anyway
  • School closures, lockdowns etc were enacted despite counter to “expert” reccomendations
  • hospitals were never over-crowded, and in fact had much lower than average occupancy

…and that’s just a taste.

Telling quotes include this, from an unknown RKI official:

“it would be good to get the ministers oral orders in written form”

Which, as Prof Homburg points out, is clearly about individuals/institutions protecting themselves from potential fall out.

Or this, concerning vaccines:

A number of vaccines will become available, that have been tested in quick succession. Relevant data will be collected post-marketing.

Which shows, yet again, that the vaccines had no trial data available prior to their emergency approval.

Or there’s this one, written on the second day of lockdown:

Results show Sars-Cov2 is not circulating widely, these should not be publicized or justifying further measures will be made difficult.”

Which show the measures were the aim, not controlling a “disease” which was never out of control.

While all this is potentially important information to add to the now-bulging “Covid was a scam” folder, it does also prompt the usual questions. Why this? Why now?

147 Comments

I just spent an hour reading these INSIGHTFUL comments and finally FINALLY got some idea of how we were all CONNED!

Read them all HERE: https://off-guardian.org/2024/11/13/watch-rki-whistleblower-uncovers-covid-scam/

Continue reading “WATCH: ” Whistleblower Uncovers Covid Scam” + 175 Comments”

Vaccine Billionaires vs. Human Guinea Pigs

by Colin Todhunter at off-guardian.org shared with thanks

How do you make a potentially dangerous and ineffective drug appear like a miracle of modern science? You could, for instance, enrol only certain people in clinical trials and exclude others or bring the study to a close as soon as you see a spike in the data that implies evidence of effectiveness.

There are many ways to do it.

According to health practitioner and writer Craig Stellpflug in his article ‘Big Pharma: Getting away with murder’(2012), the strategy is to get in quick, design the study to get the result you want, get out fast and make lots of money.

Stellpflug says:

If a study comes up negative for your favorite drug, just don’t publish it! 68 per cent of all drug studies are swept under the carpet to keep those pesky side effects from being reported. Only 32 per cent of studies come up positive and a lot of those studies are ‘shortened’ to limit the long-term findings. Studies cut short were found to overestimate the study drug’s effectiveness and miss dangerous side effects and complications by an average of 30 per cent. This would explain the amazing 85 per cent drug study success rate in the hands of Big Pharma according to the Annals of Internal Medicine.”

Of course, it helps to get the regulatory agencies on board and to convince the media and health officials of the need for your wonder product and its efficacy and safety. In the process, well-paid career scientists and ‘science’ effectively become shaped and led by corporate profit margins and political processes.

And what better way to make a financial killing than by making a mountain out of a molehill and calling it a ‘pandemic’?

Continue reading “Vaccine Billionaires vs. Human Guinea Pigs”