I can now finally prove, using gold-standard record-level data, that both mRNA shots increased all-cause mortality and that other brands were worse.

by Steve Kirsch at kirschsubstack on 20th November 2024 via thefreeonline Telegramt.me/thefreeonline

Here’s a quick summary of the key pieces of evidence that taken together show that the COVID vaccines are unsafe and that the medical community should not be trusted.

Fist a short list of some of my other favorite pieces of evidence that are consistent with the vaccines are unsafe and cannot be explained otherwise:

1. The shortest “proof” of the lack of any benefits and impact on mortality is in this article: The COVID vaccine: all risk, no benefit
2. They cannot explain any of the 100% verifiable anecdotes like what Jay Bonnar passively observed. Probability of this happening by chance: 5.6e-22. There is only one explanation, isn’t there?
3. The stats of Ed Dowd’s book (499 out of 500 were vaccinated when it should have been only around 75%. Probability of this happening if the vaccines were safe: 6.1e-10
4. VAERS mortality and injury reports are more than all vaccines combined
5. Papers published in the medical literature especially the paper on cause of death after vaccines by Peter McCullough
6. All the vaccine injured, disabled, and dead including my friends.
7. The unprecedented number of athletes dropping or dead
8. What happened at Apple Valley village where deaths climbed 8X immediately after the vaccine rollout
9. What happened at Tidewater Family Practice went from 8 to 10 deaths per year to 48 deaths per year with all the excess deaths ascribed to the COVID vaccine
10. The lack of success stories from any nursing home
11. The US Nursing home data
12. the JAMA study showing COVID vaccines do not reduce hospitalization risk at all.
13. Del Bigtree: “No safety trial was ever properly done on any of the vaccines. There is no post-licensure safety trials being done. They’re only asking for the funding now. Now you know that whether vaccines are safe or not is an absolute guess.
14. The 19” clots pulled from vaccinated people. The embalmer says, “I never seen clotting like this prior to 2021! The first 20 years in my field, I don’t ever recall seeing clots like this. I’m not the only embalmer seeing this.”

Here’s a list of over 50 pieces of evidence. You decide which column to put each of these in:

1. Toxic shot: This is a book co-authored by one of the top epidemiologists in the US, Yale Professor Harvey Risch. From the description of the book: “From 2021–2023, the United States alone suffered 600,000 unexplained excess deaths not associated with COVID-19…”
2. Doctors are told to trust the FDA and CDC when prescribing vaccines. All the post-marketing safety data is kept hidden by health authorities so not even doctors can look at the data themselves to find out if any vaccine is safe. Doctors thus have no choice but to trust the authorities since the data is kept secret. They are essentially told: “do what we tell you to do, do not question authority or we will take away your license.” Note: By data, I am referring to the patient record level data. This could be easily disclosed by the health authorities without violating anyone’s confidentiality (as I proved with the New Zealand record level data) but it never is.
3. The CDC itself doesn’t have the data to make a post-marketing independent vaccine safety assessment and they are not interested in obtaining the data either! The CDC relies on the FDA who relies on the manufacturer to test the product. The CDC could ask states for vaccination records tied to death records, but they don’t want to even ask because if they did a safety analysis, it could be discovered in a FOIA request. The CDC basically has no interest whatsoever in verifying what the actual safety data is. When I offered to show them the NZ data before I published it (so they would finally have record level data), they declined to look at it. The CDC takes basically a “head in the sand approach.” I went to CDC headquarters and spoke face to face with the director of media relations. I asked him why they don’t ask the states for the information and he said they don’t have the authority to do so. I asked, “Have you tried saying please?” He repeated his earlier statement.
4. Lack of transparency by health authorities. Not a single health authority anywhere in the world has ever released anonymized record-level patient data for independent researchers to assess the safety of any vaccine. There isn’t any paper in a peer-reviewed journal showing that health outcomes are improved if public health data is kept secret. So why keep it secret? I proved that the record level data (which is “gold-standard” ground truth) can be anonymized and disclosed without harming anyone. While record-level patient data would be the most definitive, a detailed time-series cohort analyses can be easily produced by health authorities and published for everyone to see. These would show safety signals and do not jeopardize patient privacy. These are always kept hidden. The lone exception is the UK ONS, but they made their “buckets” so large that you cannot see the impact of the vaccine. When I asked them to redo their analysis with smaller buckets, they stopped responding to me. So I haven’t found a single health authority who wants to find out if the vaccines are safe. They all want to trust others and they all refuse to analyze their own data. This is not confidence inspiring.
5. Lack of interest in data transparency by the medical community, media, lawmakers, and public officials. There are only a few examples of people in the medical community, mainstream media, or public officials who have called for data transparency of public health data. The rest of them prefer to keep the public in the dark. MP Andrew Bridgen in the UK has. MP Philip Davies has (see part in bold):

When asked for more detailed analysis, the authorities refuse to provide it. Seven members of Parliament requested the UK ONS to re-do an analysis with with a more detailed parameter so we could finally determine whether or not the vaccines were safe. The head of the UK ONS denied the request falsely claiming that the request would reveal PII and would not provide any new insights.