Ideas For A Dystopian Novel – by Caitlin Johnstone

Ideas For A Dystopian Novel Caitlin Johnstone Jan 17 2022 58 Likes 42 comments

Listen to a reading of this article: https://w.soundcloud.com/p

I’ve been kicking around some ideas for a dystopian novel lately, and I was hoping readers might be able to provide me with some feedback.

I’m picturing a story set in a world where everyone’s a slave but doesn’t know it. People think thoughts they believe they came up with themselves, make decisions and lifestyle choices that they think are their own, buy things they sincerely believe they want, consume entertainment they honestly feel they enjoy, vote for political candidates they truly think they support, when in reality they’re all marching in complete obedience to an elite ruling class whose high-level mastery of mass-scale psychological manipulation has bent the public to their will.

In my novel people will be funneled from early childhood through an education system designed by plutocrats and social engineers to create efficient and compliant gear-turners, then when they are grown their programming continues in the form of mass media indoctrination. If they become politically aware they are funneled into artificially constructed ideological perspectives that are designed to look truthful and appealing but which don’t challenge existing power structures in any meaningful way.

In the same way, the political system in this dark alternate reality is designed to look free and democratic, but there’s no real connection between how people vote and the way their civilization actually functions. An unacknowledged, unofficial alliance of plutocrats and government operatives makes the actual decisions about how money, industry, government, and military forces will behave from day to day, and this secretive alliance controls the official political system the public believes is responsible for overseeing those matters. What people call “elections” are actually just the public choosing between two lackeys of that ruling alliance, and their only meaningful disagreements are on how the will of those rulers should best be advanced.

My dystopian society is built on endless violence, oppression and exploitation, but because in this world the science of mass-scale psychological manipulation is so advanced, people don’t even know that it’s happening. Mass murder is committed continuously in nonstop military operations overseas, and the public is successfully convinced that it’s to promote freedom and democracy and keep them safe from terrorism. People have to work multiple jobs in the wealthiest nation in the world just to put food on the table, and they are brainwashed into believing it’s their fault for not making better life choices. People die of exposure on the streets while billionaires rake in exponentially more wealth, and the public is programmed to believe it’s because the latter work harder than the former. Police forces and prison systems keep expanding in order to exert more control and people are trained to believe it’s to make them safe from crime. Journalists are imprisoned for telling the truth and people are told it’s to protect national security. Information on the internet is aggressively controlled and people are propagandized into accepting that it’s to protect them from dangerous speech. 

In my dystopian novel the powerful will simply do as they please and then promote narratives to explain why those actions were justified. If a smaller, weaker government isn’t sufficiently obedient to the world’s dominant power structure, reasons will be manufactured to explain why they must be ousted. If it’s necessary to exert more control at home or abroad, justifications will emerge for why military expansionism is needed in this or that geostrategically important region or why increased domestic surveillance is required to keep people safe. The armed goons and war machines move wherever they are needed, and the public is either kept in the dark about those movements or told made-up stories explaining why they must occur.

Endless mass military slaughter is essential for the existence of the ruling power structure in this dystopia, because without it the world’s governments would simply behave in whatever way advances their own interests. The government is so profoundly corrupt that the corporations who manufacture military weaponry are inseparably intertwined with the decision-making apparatus of its foreign policy establishment and are permitted to actively lobby for more wars so that more of its expensive weaponry will be used. Mountains of human corpses are amassed for no other reason than because it is more profitable to launch weapons at them than to leave them alone. Nuclear weapons are stockpiled and placed around the world for no other reason than because it is profitable to make more of them.

It’s the same with environmental and economic policies. A global system is held in place at gunpoint in which mass-scale human behavior is driven by the pursuit of profit for its own sake, so environmental and economic policies just like military policies are formed not based on what would be best but on what would be most profitable for the plutocrats who shape those policies. Industry moves in whatever way rakes in the most money, no matter who it hurts, no matter how badly it imperils humanity.

And everyone just marches along with it, because they are manipulated into accepting this disaster by sophisticated propaganda systems, by movies and TV shows designed to normalize the dystopia they exist in, by tightly controlled information access, and by their own psychological compartmentalization since the reality of their situation is too disturbing to look at directly. They turn the gears of their dark world and then stay up late binging on soulless comedy shows to distract them from the horrors lurking just beneath the surface.

Obviously such a dystopia would be completely unsustainable and the most obvious ending would be to kill the whole world off within a few books by nuclear war or ecological disaster or something equally terrible, but maybe I could have the populace simply wake up to the manipulations and take back their will and shrug off the elites’ control like a warm coat on a summer’s day? I dunno. Something tells me that for some unknown reason today’s readers are too inured with learned helplessness and knee-jerk pessimism to be able to even imagine such a scenario, let alone accept it as a believable development.

Anyway, that’s my pitch. What do you all think? Does this thing have legs? Or is it too different from today’s world for people to relate to?

______________________

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, following me on FacebookTwitterSoundcloud or YouTube, or throwing some money into my tip jar on Ko-fiPatreon or Paypal. If you want to read more you can buy my books. The best way to make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here

Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Feature image by Ray Dumas, Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Share

Comments

Gilbert GélinasJan 17·edited Jan 17Anyone who has followed you, even for a little while, would recognize your description of the state of the world in your synopsis. And I quite agree with it in general but there’s one point I don’t buy: that the ruling class would mindlessly lead their world to oblivion.There are historical precedents to my argument. In the 19th century, the United Kingdom passed laws that limited working hours and implemented safety measures in the workplaces. It wasn’t out of compassion, although the government wanted to be credited as such for obvious political reasons.It was because they had noticed something that had alarmed them. The price of work, that is the salaries, were on an irresistible upward move. So they formed an inquiry which discovered they had been depleting the UK of three generations of workers in the course of one.Since individual employers couldn’t implement corrections without putting themselves at a competing disadvantage, it had to pass through legislation. Of course, not everyone was pleased. In fact, the opposition came mostly from small businesses for which the measures were proportionally more costly. On top of that, the big corporations had lawyers that knew ways to pass the fiscal bill to the smaller ones.So the big companies were the liberals and the smaller ones, the conservatives. In order to have their program passed, the liberals sought the support of the working class which, of course, obliged. And that is why the liberals gained the reputation of being progressives.It also brought the elites of the working class to believe they had won a fundamental battle and that class justice could be reached within the system.But about a century later, technical progress made it possible to relocate production at low cost, that is the cost of importing the production was low but also the new locations were places where workers didn’t have the same protections and accepted lower conditions. Which is, not by coincidence, the time when free trade became a religion because it’s not beneficial to produce at low cost elsewhere if you have to pay compensating custom taxes when importing your product.And the workers unions found they couldn’t do a thing about it, especially since the workers’ parties thought they had to go along in order to have access to power.Right now, there’s a shrinking population phenomenon happening. Not through eugenics, as some would believe but through a relatively natural process of which some researchers identify urbanism and women’s education as the main causes. It’s presently obscured by the surviving mass of the baby boomers but they’re globally retiring and entering their exctintion phase. The next generations are not reproducing at replacement level. In fact, Japan is already experiencing population shrinkage.The ruling class is already addressing this problem with the Great Reset because capitalism needs growth so they’ll have to implement authoritarian measures to maintain their domination in the context of a shrinking economy. I believe this phoney pandemic is part of the program. But go explain that to propagandized people.So, they’re not as clueless as they seem. And, as Mao said, it’s natural to hate your ennemies but it’s a mistake to underestimate themExpand full comment
9Reply
AllyJan 17That’s not a novel, that’s a non-fiction book about reality.
8Reply

40 more comments…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: