Con otro lote de 11.000 documentos de Pfizer, publicado el 1 de abril de 2022, la primera revelación explosiva es que la inmunidad natural es efectiva, y Pfizer lo ha sabido todo el tiempo.
Los datos del ensayo clínico mostraron que no hubo diferencia en los resultados entre aquellos con infección previa por COVID y aquellos que recibieron la vacuna. Ninguno de los grupos experimentó una infección grave. La inmunidad natural también fue estadísticamente idéntica a la inyección en términos de riesgo de infección.
Los adultos más jóvenes son más propensos a experimentar efectos secundarios
La segunda revelación es que los efectos secundarios de las inyecciones fueron más graves en las personas más jóvenes, de 18 a 55 años, que en las de 55 años o más. (El riesgo de efectos secundarios también aumentó con dosis adicionales, por lo que el riesgo fue mayor después de la segunda dosis que la primera).
El riesgo de COVID grave es dramáticamente menor en las personas más jóvenes que en las mayores de 60 años, lo que hace que un riesgo elevado de efectos secundarios sea inaceptable.
With Warsaw refusing to pay in rubles, Russia will suspend deliveries starting Wednesday, the Polish state company confirmed
According to a statement from the Polish gas firm, “Gazprom informed PGNiG of its intention to completely suspend deliveries under the Yamal contract at the beginning of the contract day on April 27.”
Earlier on Tuesday, a Gazprom spokesman announced that “today, Poland is obliged to pay for gas supplies in accordance with the new payment procedure,” referring to Russia’s demand that “unfriendly countries” buy its gas in rubles.
Poland has refused to follow this procedure, and on Tuesday sanctioned Gazprom, which owns a 48% stake in the Polish company that co-owns the Yamal-Europe gas pipeline. The 4,000km line transports gas from the Yamal Peninsula and western Siberia to Germany and Poland via Belarus.
Media reports soon followed, suggesting that the supply to Poland had already been stopped, and that the government in Warsaw had convened a crisis meeting.
PGNiG insisted that supplies to consumers would be uninterrupted, with gas in storage and sourced from other suppliers making up the shortfall.
Poland has been one of the staunchest proponents of the anti-Russia sanctions imposed by the US and EU since Russia launched its military operation in Ukraine in February, and has allowed Western weapons to enter Ukraine from its territory.
While some gas-dependent countries such as Germany have cautioned the EU against cutting off the flow of gas from Russia, and others like Hungary have stated that they will keep buying Russia’s product, Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki has vowed to ban all Russian coal, oil and gas imports by the end of the year.
Polish government officials, as well as PGNiG representatives, confirmed that Russia will cut off gas deliveries to Poland, under the supply contract from the Siberian Yamal Peninsula, https://www.onet.pl website reported.
After hearing this news, reference gas futures in Europe, which are listed on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange, increased by 17% in a matter of an hour.
Russia to halt gas shipments to Poland, signaling escalation …https://news.yahoo.com ›Russia will cut off natural gas supplies to Polandand Bulgaria on Wednesday, government and industry sources told Polish news on Tuesday. European gas prices soared on the report, climbing as high as 17%. The move signals escalation between the Kremlin and the European Union, which has imposed a series of …
Russian energy giant Gazprom will cease delivering gas to Bulgaria on Wednesday, the country’s energy ministry announced on Tuesday. The news comes after the Saint Petersburg firm confirmed it will also halt supplies to Poland, with both countries refusing to pay for energy supplies in rubles…..
SOMOS MUCHAS LAS PERSONAS QUE CELEBRAMOS ESTA LECCIÓN AL PUEBLO POLACO, TAN CRISTIANO Y TAN FASCISTA QUE LO MÁS LÓGICO SERÍA REBELARSE CONTRA ESE GOBIERNO Y COMENZAR A ABANDONAR LA ESTÚPIDA RUSOFOBIA QUE IMPONE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA A CUYOS SOCIOS RUSIA DEBERÍA CORTARLES… BUENO, ESO Y EL GAS
Funcionarios del gobierno polaco, así como representantes de PGNiG, confirmaron que Rusia ha cortado las entregas de gas a Polonia, en el marco del contrato de suministro procedente de la península siberiana de Yamal, según informó el sitio web Onet.pl.
Tras conocerse esta noticia, los futuros del gas de referencia en Europa, que cotizan en la Bolsa de Ámsterdam, se incrementaron un 17% en cuestión de una hora.
SOMOS MUCHAS LAS PERSONAS QUE CELEBRAMOS ESTA LECCIÓN AL PUEBLO POLACO, TAN CRISTIANO Y TAN FASCISTA QUE LO MÁS LÓGICO SERÍA REBELARSE CONTRA ESE GOBIERNO Y COMENZAR A ABANDONAR LA ESTÚPIDA RUSOFOBIA QUE IMPONE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA A CUYOS SOCIOS RUSIA DEBERÍA CORTARLES… BUENO, ESO Y EL GAS
Funcionarios del gobierno polaco, así como representantes de PGNiG, confirmaron que Rusia ha cortado las entregas de gas a Polonia, en el marco del contrato de suministro procedente de la península siberiana de Yamal, según informó el sitio web Onet.pl.
Tras conocerse esta noticia, los futuros del gas de referencia en Europa, que cotizan en la Bolsa de Ámsterdam, se incrementaron un 17% en cuestión de una hora.
‘A large-scale nuclear war would however be catastrophic, and no state would be able to guard against the effects.’
Companies are ‘overwhelmed with enquiries’ for NUCLEAR BUNKERS in Switzerland and reporting shortage of materials following Ukraine invasion
Since 1960s, every Swiss municipality had to build nuclear bunkers for residents
Residents are now contacting specialist companies to build or renovate shelters
The bunkers are being viewed in a new light since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
Companies that build and repair bomb shelters are being ‘overwhelmed with enquiries’ for nuclear fallout bunkers in Switzerland, as Russian’s invasion of Ukraine has reawakened interest in the secure facilities.
Residents in Switzerland, where nuclear bunkers have been mandatory for every household since the 1960s, are now contacting the companies to build or renovate their shelters to make sure they can be protected in the event of bombings or nuclear war.
Demand is so high for the concrete nuclear bunkers that specialist companies are now facing shortages in raw materials required to build them………………………………………………………………….
Switzerland’s vast network of nuclear bunkers have a range of other day-to-day uses, including as military barracks or as temporary accommodation for asylum seekers. But Swiss authorities require that they can be emptied and reverted back to nuclear shelters within five days.
So far, Switzerland’s population has never been ordered down into the shelters, not even in the wake of the Chernobyl disaster.
Experts say the most likely scenario for needing to use them has always been a possible accident at one of Switzerland’s own nuclear power plants.
But now the conflict raging in Ukraine has added a new, urgent layer to the national nuclear anxiety.
With public concern growing, Swiss authorities have published overviews of the available shelter spots, and have urged households to always maintain a stock of food to last at least a week. ………………………………..
Experts caution though that the level of protection provided by the shelters in the case of actual nuclear weapons use would depend heavily on the intensity and proximity of the strikes.
‘The shelters could offer the population a certain level of temporary protection against radioactive events,’ Swiss defence ministry spokesman Andreas Bucher said.
Ask a hundred Americans and you’ll be lucky to find even one who’s ever heard of Minsk II. But ask those same Americans how the Ukraine war started, and you’ll likely get “Russian President Putin woke up one day and decided to re-establish the Soviet empire, starting with Ukraine.”
That is because our government and its slavishly loyal media have created a false narrative for maximum propaganda to support pouring billions in weaponry into the Ukraine war zone, ensuring that death and destruction will proceed endlessly.
Minsk II was the 2015 agreement hammered out by Russia, Ukraine, France and Germany to end the civil war in Ukraine between the pro west, ultra nationalist government and the pro Russian Ukrainians in the eastern Donbas provinces of Lugansk and Donetsk.
Why a civil war in Ukraine? Historically, Ukraine was cobbled together first by the Russian Empire, then the Soviet Union over 4 centuries, containing disparate peoples. The main ones were the Western leaning, Ukrainian speaking people in the north and west, and the Russian speaking in the east and south.
Their relationship was always toxic, but under Soviet rule relative peace prevailed. Once freed from Soviet rule in 1999, the tension between the two disparate groups resurfaced. Fifteen years on the U.S. essentially blew up whatever chance for peaceful resolution by aiding a coup which violently removed Russian leaning President Yanukovych, replacing him with an ultra nationalist government under Petro Poroshenko.
Thus began the civil war in the Donbas that has killed over 14,000 Ukrainians in Kiev’s effort to subjugate and marginalize the hated Russian leaning Ukrainians. And leading the carnage for the past 3 years is current president Volodymyr Zelensky. Calling him the new Churchill doesn’t quite fit.
But Ukraine had an off ramp from civil war early on in the form of the Minsk and then the Minsk II agreements in 2014 and 2015. The latter called for autonomy for the breakaway provinces Donetsk and Lugansk, amnesty to the combatants and representation in the Ukraine government.
But goaded by the US and the ultra nationalists with the real power, both post coup presidents Poroshenko and Zelensky opted to continue the civil war to both retake the breakaway provinces and recapture the Crimea, seized by Russia after the 2014 coup threatened their naval base at Sebastopol in the Crimea.
In the months leading up to Russia’s criminal war, Ukraine, with the help of weaponry and training by Uncle Sam, dramatically increased its criminal shelling of the Donbas, even massing a hundred thousand troops for a possible invasion predicted for March.
Did that, and the threat of NATO’s encroachment in Ukraine up to Russia’s borders make Russia’s invasion legal or necessary for Russia’s national defense? Of course not. But expecting Russia would sit back and do nothing made their invasion virtually inevitable.
On February 24, that inevitability occurred, costing thousands of senseless deaths, putting the world in danger of worldwide recession, millions of poor worldwide facing starvation from food shortages and worst of all….nuclear war.
Millions of words have been spilled by our government and our media framing this war as the madman in the Kremlin and his dreams of a reconstituted Soviet empire. But they could do better with just two words that Ukraine and US refused to honor and implement: Minsk II.
Walt Zlotow became involved in antiwar activities upon entering University of Chicago in 1963. He is current president of the West Suburban Peace Coalition based in the Chicago western suburbs. He blogs daily on antiwar and other issues at www.heartlandprogressive.blogspot.com.
Last year, a Pandora Papers leak revealed that Mr Zelensky, who campaigned on promises to “break the system” of oligarchic control and corruption in Ukraine, set up a spider web of offshore companies in 2012. Zelensky’s office justified the move by saying they were a form of “protection” against former President Viktor Yanukovych.
Ilya Kiva, a Ukrainian opposition lawmaker who was stripped of his mandate last month, alleges that “hundreds of millions of dollars” are being wired to accounts controlled by the president’s office, where they are being plundered, not just by Zelensky and his staff, but by “Western politicians who get kickbacks for their [countries’] assistance”. Kiva has suggested that Zelensky’s earnings have recently jumped to about “$100 million a month”.
A Dutch political party has taken an interest in Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s personal finances.
“Zelensky has a fortune: various estimates put his wealth at around $850 million. He amassed most of it after taking office as president. Where does the money come from? And more importantly, where is it going?” the Forum for Democracy asked in posts on its Twitter and Telegram accounts on Monday.
Zelensky bezit een fortuin: verschillende schattingen komen uit rond de 850 miljoen. Het grootste deel hiervan kreeg hij pas na zijn aantreden als president. Waar komt dat geld dan vandaan? En belangrijker nog: waar gaat het heen? #FVDpic.twitter.com/32MktnPsXJ
Translated from Dutch .. . Zelensky owns a fortune: various estimates put it at around 850 million. He didn’t get most of this until after he took office as president. So where does that money come from? And more importantly, where is it going? #FVD
The Dutch national conservative and hardline Eurosceptic party boycotted Zelensky’s speech to the Dutch parliament last month, denouncing it as a violation of nearly two centuries of democratic tradition, which forbid foreign heads of state from speaking before the House of Representatives.
The party also expressed concerns about Zelensky’s ban of political parties, including the main opposition party, and the shuttering of TV channels critical of his regime.
The Forum for Democracy did not specify where it got its $850 million estimate.
Ilya Kiva, a Ukrainian opposition lawmaker who was stripped of his mandate last month, alleges that “hundreds of millions of dollars” are being wired to accounts controlled by the president’s office, where they are being plundered, not just by Zelensky and his staff, but by “Western politicians who get kickbacks for their [countries’] assistance”. Kiva has suggested that Zelensky’s earnings have recently jumped to about “$100 million a month”.
Before becoming president in 2019, Zelensky co-owned the Kvartal 95 television entertainment company, which he co-founded in 2003. Last week, Volodymyr Landa, deputy editor-in-chief of Forbes Ukraine, said that the company earns about $20-$30 million per year, with Zelensky owning a 25 percent stake.
Before the 2019 election, Zelensky’s family also earned a 25 percent stake in the Maltex Multicapital Corp, a tax shelter in the British Virgin Islands, through a separate Belize-registered shell company, Film Heritage, according to the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project. Zelensky insisted after the election that he had dropped his share in the company, and has not mentioned the company in any of his tax declarations since 2018.
However, in October 2021, the OCCRP reported that the president, his family, and members of his inner circle have held on to Maltex, and operate an entire network of shady offshore companies, at least two of them used to buy property in London near the famous 221B Baker Street and the Houses of Parliament.
Ihor Kolomoisky, a Ukrainian oligarch who heavily sponsored Zelensky’s campaign in 2019, has himself been accused of stealing $5.5 billion from PrivatBank, Ukraine’s largest commercial lender, and funnelling it offshore.
Pressed by media over the offshore-related revelations late last year, Mykhailo Podoliak, an adviser to Zelensky’s chief of staff, assured that the president had been forced to create the offshores to “protect” income from the “aggressive actions” of the “corrupt” government of President Viktor Yanukovych.
“Journalists have de facto confirmed the president’s absolute respect for the standards of anti-corruption legislation”, Podoliak said.
Yanukovych was ousted in a Western-backed coup in 2014, giving rise to the Ukraine crisis which continues to this day.
The Free 