from thefreeonñine – https://wp.me/pIJl9-E2c on 15th Sept 2024 by Barbara Crane Navarro – Rainforest Art Project ( on Telegram: https://t.me/thefreeonline )
The future of the Indigenous peoples of Brazil is at stake


Indigenous people brandishing the Brazilian Constitution in 2021
« ‘They ripped off our leaves
broke our branches
cut our trunks
But they forgot to pull out our roots’
And today we are here fighting for life. They still don’t understand it.
But it is true that Indigenous peoples are in danger of disappearing!
Please remain attentive and mobilized! NO to the Time Frame Trick! »

LAND BACK NOW! « Land for the Indigenous people has no commercial value, as in the private sense of civil possession. It is a relationship of identity, which includes spirituality and existence, and it is possible to affirm that there is no Indigenous community without land! »
NOW: INTERNATIONAL COMPLAINT ABOUT THE « TIME FRAME »
On Thursday, September 12, 2024, APIB was on the agenda of the UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights in the context of climate change, and the UN Special Rapporteur on the human right to a healthy environment along with 21 embassies.
Apib reported on the different violations of the rights of Indigenous peoples due to Law 14,701/2023, on the Conciliation Chamber of the Temporal Framework proposed by Minister Gilmar Mendes, and also on the threat of PEC 48 which intends to include the Temporal Framework in the Federal Constitution.
The Executive Coordinator of APIB by COIAB, Kleber Karipuna, and the Legal Coordinator of APIB, Maurício Terena, drew attention to procedural violations in access to justice and colonial stereotypes presented in the Conciliation Chamber, resulting in APIB’s withdrawal from this process, and the impacts of the Time Frame thesis both in the increase in violence against Indigenous people and in efforts to combat the climate crisis.
The general representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Jan Jarab, participated virtually in the meeting and reiterated the United Nations’ position contrary to the Temporal Framework, and informed that he will again express his concerns about the violations against Brazil.
BEFORE:

In a landmark court case that was first presented in 2017, only two justices have voted. The case has been postponed repeatedly over the years…
Brazil’s Supreme Court Minister Edson Fachin cast his vote to reject the time frame thesis and in favor of Indigenous peoples’ rights.
Fachin stated: « There is no greater legal certainty than complying with the Constitution, » rebutting the ruralist argument that demarcations without a « time frame » generate legal uncertainty.
In his vote, Fachin defends that Indigenous constitutional rights cannot be set back, « since these rights are linked to the very condition of existence of these communities and their way of life. »
He rejects interpretations that try to equate Indigenous ownership and civil ownership, as the time frame thesis does. « Indigenous lands », he says, « are broader than ‘a set of huts’; they comprise all the territory necessary for the existence of the peoples. »

He added that « Land for the Indigenous people has no commercial value, as in the private sense of civil possession. It is a relationship of identity, which includes spirituality and existence, and it is possible to affirm that there is no Indigenous community without land »
Continue reading “LAND BACK NOW! “Land for the Indigenous in Brazil has no commercial value.. It’s about identity, spirituality and existence”..”















