blog of the post capitalist transition.. Read or download the novel here + latest relevant posts
Author: thefreeonline
The Free is a book and a blog. Download free E/book ...”the most detailed fictional treatment of the movement from a world recognizably like our own to an anarchist society that I have read...
Fuellmich and his team present the incorrect PCR test and the order for doctors to describe any comorbidity death as a Covid death – as fraud.
The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% inaccurate at 35 cycles. All PCR tests monitored by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC acknowledges that tests over 28 cycles are not allowed for a positive reliable result.
This invalidates over 90% of the alleged Covid cases / “infections” detected by the use of this incorrect test.
In the fields of Notre Dame des Landes, in western France, stands a disobedient lighthouse. It was built far from the sea, exactly where the control tower of a new international airport was supposed to be built. This short 17 minute film documents its construction by a ragged crew – including deserting architects, an ex-homeless kid, art activists, a ceramicist, a few farmers and a genius welder whose day job was building the world’s biggest cruise-liners in France’s largest shipyard.
In January 2016 all legal procedures countering the airport project had run their course and construction was given the green light. Manuel Valls, ex-Interior Minister who had to pull back his troops from the zad in 2012, was now Prime Minister. “The government will not give in to intimidations by a minority of individuals, the laws of the republic will be applied to Notre-Dame-des-Landes like everywhere else” he asserted…
US President Joe Biden’s administration has doubled down on the claim that China is mounting a genocide against the Uighur people in the Xinjiang region. But it has offered no proof, and unless it can, the State Department should withdraw the charge and support a UN-based of the situation in Xinjiang.
NEW YORK/LONDON – The US government needlessly escalated its rhetoric against China by claiming that a genocide is being mounted against the Uighur people in the Xinjiang region.
Such a grave charge matters, as genocide is rightly considered “the crime of crimes.” Many pundits are now calling for a boycott of the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing, dubbing them the “Genocide Olympics.”
Try typing ”Some Uyghurs are jihadi terrorists” in Google and you will see only thousands and thousands of posts about how horrible China is Genociding innocent Uyghurs and must be punished, sanctioned, boycotted and reviled.
The genocide charge was made on the final day of Donald Trump’s administration by then-Secretary of State Michael Pompeo, who made no secret of his belief in lying as a tool of US foreign policy. Now President Joe Biden’s administration has doubled down on Pompeo’s flimsy claim, even though the State Department’s own top lawyers reportedly share our skepticism regarding the charge.
This year’s State Department Country Reports on Human Rights Practices (HRP) follows Pompeo in accusing China of genocide in Xinjiang. Because the HRP never uses the term other than once in the report’s preface and again in the executive summary of the China chapter, readers are left to guess about the evidence.
Xinjiang was historically a poor semi arid region, now it’s booming like never before. But because it borders Afghanistan it is in line for ”destabilization” bybthe US war machine.
Much of the report deals with issues like freedom of expression, refugee protection, and free elections, which have scant bearing on the genocide charge.There are credible charges of human rights abuses against Uighurs, but those do not per se constitute genocide.
And we must understand the context of the Chinese crackdown in Xinjiang, which had essentially the same motivation as America’s foray into the Middle East and Central Asia after the September 2001 attacks: to stop the terrorism of militant Islamic groups.
As the Hong Kong-based businessman and writer Weijian Shan has recounted, China experienced repeated terrorist attacks in Xinjiang during the same years that America’s flawed response to 9/11 led to repeated US violations of international law and massive bloodshed.
Xinjiang’s social, economic progress Sep 25, 2019 — — Xinjiang has achieved a decisive advance in poverty alleviation . From 2014 to 2018, about 2.3 million people were lifted out of poverty, with the region’s poverty headcount ratio dropping from 19.4 percent to 6.1 percent.
Indeed, until late 2020, the US classified the Uighur East Turkestan Islamic Movement as a terrorist group, battled Uighur fighters in Afghanistan, and held many as prisoners. In July 2020, the United Nations noted the presence of thousands of Uighur fighters in Afghanistan and Syria.
The charge of genocide should never be made lightly. Inappropriate use of the term may escalate geopolitical and military tensions and devalue the historical memory of genocides such as the Holocaust, thereby hindering the ability to prevent future genocides. It behooves the US government to make any charge of genocide responsibly, which it has failed to do here.
Genocide is defined under international law by the UN Genocide Convention (1948). Subsequent judicial decisions have clarified its meaning. Most countries, including the United States, have incorporated the Convention’s definition into their domestic legislation without any significant alteration.
In the past few decades, the leading UN courts have confirmed that the definition requires proof to a very high standard of the intentional physical destruction of a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group.The definition specifies that one of five acts must be perpetrated. Obviously, killing tops the list.
The State Department’s report on China says there were “numerous reports” of killings, but that “few or no details were available,” and cites only one case – that of a Uighur man detained since 2017 who died of natural causes, according to the authorities.
Ex Secretary of State Mike Pompeo declares China to be committing Genocide, without evidence, a charge now widely accepted in the world media and reopeated billions of times..
The report doesn’t even explain why the official explanation should be questioned.Technically, genocide can be proven even without evidence that people were killed. But because courts require proof of intent to destroy the group physically, it is hard to make the case in the absence of proof of large-scale killings.
This is especially true when there is no direct evidence of genocidal intent, for example in the form of policy statements, but merely circumstantial evidence, what international courts refer to as a “pattern of conduct.”
International courts have repeatedly said that where genocide charges are based only upon inferences drawn from a pattern of conduct, alternative explanations must be ruled out definitively.
That’s why the International Court of Justice rejected in 2015 the genocide charge against Serbia and the counter-charge against Croatia, despite evidence of brutal ethnic cleansing in Croatia.So, what else might constitute evidence of genocide in China?
The State Department report refers to mass internment of perhaps one million Uighurs. If proven, that would constitute a gross violation of human rights; but, again, it is not evidence, per se, of intent to exterminate. Another of the five recognized acts of genocide is “imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.”
The State Department report refers to China’s notoriously aggressive birth-control policies. Until recently, China strictly enforced its one-child policy on the majority of its population but was more liberal toward ethnic minorities, including the Uighur.
Today, the one-child policy is no longer applied to the majority Han Chinese, but stricter measures have been imposed on Xinjiang’s Muslim minority, whose families are traditionally larger than China’s average. Still, Xinjiang records a positive overall population growth rate, with the Uighur population growing faster than the non-Uighur population in Xinjiang during 2010-18.
ETIM is a jihadi terrorist group responsible for bombings, killings and mass stabbings in Xinjiang and Syria in an attempt to form an Islamic State in China. The Trump regime has legalised the organisation, granting it facilities and monetary backing in the US. The US has a ‘Defense Budget just this year of over 750 BILLION $. It has declared China to be its number one opponent. Every day we see new reports attacking China in every way imaginable. So how many billions is the US spending to smear its number one opponent?
The genocide charge is being fueled by “studies” like the Newlines Institute report that recently made global headlines. Newlines is described as a “non-partisan” Washington, DC-based think tank.
On closer inspection, it appears to be a project of a tiny Virginia-based university with 153 students, eight full-time faculty, and an apparently conservative policy agenda.
Other leading human rights organizations have refrained from using the term. UN experts are rightly calling for the UN to investigate the situation in Xinjiang.
China’s government, for its part, has recently stated that it would welcome a UN mission to Xinjiang based on “exchanges and cooperation,” not on “guilty before proven.”
Unless the State Department can substantiate the genocide accusation, it should withdraw the charge. It should also support a UN-led investigation of the situation in Xinjiang.
The work of the UN, and notably of UN Human Rights Special Rapporteurs, is essential to promote the letter and spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
In the West, the Uyghur issue was designated as ‘central’ and ‘essential’ to achieve three main goals:
To smear and humiliate China, portraying it as a country that ‘violates human rights’, ‘religious rights’ and the rights of minorities.
Uyghurs were literally inserted by NATO countries, including Turkey, into several violent combat zones: in Syria, Afghanistan and Indonesia, to name just a few, with one sole purpose: to train and to harden its fighters, who could be later deployed as de-stabilizing factors in China, Russia and former Soviet Central Asian Republics.
To sabotage great infrastructural projects, particularly the BRI. BRI is the brainchild of China’s President Xi Jinping. High-speed rail links, highways and other infrastructural arteries would be going through Xingjian, towards east. If brutal terrorist attacks backed by the West and its Islamist allies, and perpetrated by the Uyghur terrorists, would shake the region, the entire project which has been created in order to help to improve life for the entire humanity, (by wrestling various poor and developing countries from deadly Western neo-colonialist embrace), could be jeopardized, even collapse.
William Schabas is Professor of Law at Middlesex University, London, and author of Genocide in International Law: The Crime of Crimes (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
A Report and How-To Guide from a May Day in Portland, Oregon
by CrimeThinc
Portland, Oregon may take the cake for the most creative and combative May Day 2017. Demonstrators not only defended themselves from unprovoked attacks from police who declared the march a riot—they also introduced exciting new innovations into the aesthetic of the black bloc street presence.
Here, comrades from Portland explained their goals with the giant spiders they created for May Day, and offer a helpful guide for those who wish to make spiders of their own.
Circling the A in arachnid!
How to Build Your Own Spiders—and your Mutual web
In an effort to bridge the gap between art and activism, giant spiders were assembled off-site and pushed up the street to the demonstration, stocked with water bottles, snacks, earplugs, and other party favors.
This is very unusual as even the most rumbustious of protests in recent times have generally had Violent Disorder as the most serious offence charged and we have not seen the mass use of Riot charges since the Bradford disturbances of 2001. This is bad news for everyone involved in the protest for which the police have at least 110 suspects.
England has had public order laws since ancient times. They shared the feature that there didn’t need to be an individual victim but rather the public at large or more poetically “the Queen’s Peace”.
Also similar to the principle of Joint Enterpris,e you got sentenced not for what you did but for what was done by the crowd as a whole. As a bonus, the Riot Act 1714 allowed Magistrates to order the shooting of rioters by the army. But, in the great tradition of British fair play, only after they had read the Act and given people an hour to run away or hide.
Fortunately, this was repealed in 1973 but the common law offences of Riot, Affray, Unlawful Assembly and Rout remained until too many people were acquitted by juries from protests during the Miners Strike of 1984/5. This caused a rethink.
The Public Order Act 1986 sorted out and put all the offences in one Act in a fairly logical way. Riot is the most serious and is section one. Then Violent Disorder at 2, Affray at three, Threatening Behaviour four, and Disorderly Behaviour five. With proportionally descending maximum sentences from 10 years through 5, 3, 6 months to a fine.
A section 4A got added in 1994 to spoil the structure. Riot was however very rarely charged with, even then, only a handful of convictions even for the likes of the 2002 Millwall Riot which allegedly saw 150 coppers and 26 of their horses injured.
Now there is one really good reason why there are so few riot prosecutions. Way back in 1886, the Ruling Class were fed up with their properties being destroyed by rioters. They passed a law that said that if there was a riot it was obviously the fault of the police!
And therefore the police should pay for all the property damage. Hence official “Riots” became rare. This was updated in 2016 when Riot Damages Act 1886 became the Riot Compensation Act following claims from the August 2011 disturbances that has changed this somewhat.
Despite thousands of arrests and prosecutions very few were for actual Riot though that didn’t stop lots of very harsh sentences. And withering remarks from the ludicrously named Lord Chief Justice Judge.
So what’s the difference? Riot requires 12 people present together using or threatening unlawful violence with a common person such a person of reasonable firmness would fear for their safety if they were present. Violent Disorder needs only 3 people who don’t need a common purpose and can be done by threats as well as actual violence.
Violence is pretty broad though and includes violence against property, for example, throwing an object that doesn’t hit anything. So in reality it’s not much and quite obscure so that any scuffle on a big demo could easily be either.
Sentencing
So most importantly. What do you get? The average sentence for Riot in the decade 2006 to 2016 was five years and three months. Of those convicted of Violent Disorder, only 69% got immediate custodial sentences as opposed to 100% for Riot, and these averaged 1 year 7 months.
Hence our headline. These stats are backed by the recent sentencing guidelines which make the penalties harsher than ever.
What should I do if I’m suspected of rioting?
You may wish to hand yourself into the police so your name can be cleared as quickly as possible but if you don’t fancy spending the next few years locked in a small box 23 hours a day don’t bother with that, just keep your lawyer’s number handy and have your legal defence in mind.
For most people this will be using reasonable force to defend yourself, others and preventing criminal violence by the police.
What should everyone else do?
Aside from offering solidarity and backing the defence campaign, you may wish to ponder the wisdom of Machiavelli. In his history of Florence, Nicky puts these words into the mouth of a riot leader.
“Now if the question now were whether we should take up arms, rob and burn the houses of the citizens and plunder churches I would think it worthy of further consideration…but as we have already…We must therefore in order to be pardoned for our faults, commit new ones; redoubling the mischief and multiplying the arsons and robberies and endeavour to have as many companions as we can: for when many are at fault few are punished; small crimes are chastised but great and serious ones rewarded.”
Death toll in Gaza rises to 119, as threat of a ground assault looms after Israel amasses tanks and troops near besieged enclave.
Palestinian civil defense teams take part in rescue works in the rubble of a building belonging to a Palestinian family after Israeli fighter jets conducted airstrikes in Beit Lahia, Gaza [Mustafa Hassona/Anadolu Agency]
Israel continued on Friday to bombard the Gaza Strip with air raids and artillery shells as it stepped up the deployment of troops and tanks near the besieged Palestinian enclave.
At least 119 Palestinians, including 31 children, have been killed and more than 830 wounded since hostilities flared up on Monday. Hundreds of Palestinian families have taken shelter in UN-run schools in northern Gaza to escape Israeli artillery fire.
Comment: ‘Israel’s hubris knows no bounds, it has total impunity with a continuing ‘blank check’ from the USA and now it’s legally a Jewish State any opposition is legally anti-semitic’.
Despite international calls for an immediate halt of all hostilities, including from United Nations chief Antonio Guterres, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pledged the offensive will continue “as needed to restore calm in the state of Israel”.
![Palestinian civil defense teams take part in rescue works at the rubbles of a building belonging to a Palestinian family after Israeli fighter jets conducted airstrikes in Beit Lahia, Gaza [Mustafa Hassona/Anadolu Agency]](https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/24536379.jpg?resize=770%2C513)
The Free 