from thefreeonline on 1sr March 2023 The Most Revolutionary Act and Childrens Health Defense.
Vaccine Makers Claimed COVID Shots were ‘95% Effective’ — But What Did That Mean?
Aided by media Misinformation Pfizer and Moderna still blatantly mislead us about the efficacy of their COVID vaccines by withholding the fact that there’s another way to read the data — one that has more real-world significance . That is the ‘Absolute Risk’.
In 1954, writer and repentant cigarette industry lobbyist Darrell Huff wrote the best-selling book, “How to Lie with Statistics,” with the aim of teaching the general public how to decode the “secret language of statistics.”
‘see also 95% Effective’ May Not Mean What You Think It Means – naked capitalism
In his introduction, Huff wrote: “Averages and relationships and trends and graphs are not always what they seem.” He added: “There may be more in them than meets the eye, and there may be a good deal less.
CDC lied that “COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for persons who are pregnant, might become pregnant, recently pregnant or breastfeeding”. This is just the ‘tip of the iceberg’ of Mass Murder and Crimes against Humanity for profit
Almost 70 years later, Huff’s admonition that a “well-wrapped statistic” can “sensationalize, inflate, confuse and oversimplify” seems more relevant than ever. For a pertinent modern-day example, one need look no further than COVID vaccine developers’ “headline-worthy” but misleading claims about their products’ “95% effectiveness.”
As BMJ associate editor Peter Doshi and others have confirmed since 2021 , these efficacy data are largely a matter of statistical smoke and mirrors.
see also> Did Pfizer have access to coronavirus before China discovered it? February 2023
Examining a statistic called absolute risk reduction — the two companies’ COVID vaccines barely make a dent at all, reducing someone’s risk of experiencing COVID symptoms (the clinical trials’ endpoint) by less than 1%. This is the practical number that people are likely to care about most.
Knowing the paltry real-world impact of the injections on someone’s risk of developing COVID symptoms, how many people swayed by the misleading “95% effective” mantra might instead have decided to refuse the vaccines —
Products that have revealed themselves to be highly unsafe and, in some cases, fatal?
***********
Cristian Terhes 56.7K subscribers 46,000 likes. How did Moderna begin trials on its vaccine in 2017, 2 years BEFORE the pandemic? Has Pfizer had access to coronavirus before December 2019 +.. Pfizer admits it did not know its Covid vaccine prevented transmission of virus when rollout began
*********
After blitzing us with the 95% Pfizer in 2021 went on to brazenly announce its COVID injection is “100% effective for 12-to-15 year-olds.” which led to the authorization of Pfizer’s unlicensed vaccine for the adolescent market, and eventually to children and even babies. Pregnanr women were ordered to take it from the start despite zero testing.
Continue reading “Remember! ‘Covid-19 Vaccines less than 1% ‘effective’ against our ‘absolute risk’ of getting the virus’.”
The Free 
