Notes for My Corona Investigative Committee Interview

by Margaret Anna Alice July ’22 from margaretannaalice via thefreeonline

I had the great honor of being interviewed by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, Viviane Fischer, and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg during Session 111: “Reconstellation” of the Corona Investigative Committee, whose heroic fact-finding discussions with hundreds of physicians, scientists, and other experts since July 2020 have formed a crucial part of my own education. 

They asked me to speak on the depopulation agenda explored in my Anatomy of a Philanthropath series. I regret that I overestimated how much I could cram into fifty-odd minutes so was unable to complete my presentation before the next guest arrived in the studio. I let them know I would be publishing my notes here so people can read the information I skipped over and reference the hyperlinked sources.

A Retrospective in Whys

Since the beginning of this manufactured crisis, the Berlin Corona Investigative Committee has been conducting the exploratory work that I would have expected every government and so-called public health organization to have undertaken from the outset.

The fact that this did not occur was one of the first signs that COVID represented a departure from all prior pandemic protocols, but the question I kept asking myself is, Why?

Here are some of the permutations of that question I started asking beginning in early 2020 and continuing through the present-day:

TOTALITARIANISM

• Why are governments, public health agencies, the media, Big Tech, and “experts” stoking fear instead of calmly assessing the data and attempting to dispel panic—like every responsible authority has done for genuine crises in the past?
• Why are all of these entities speaking in unison with a single voice as if everyone has been handed the same script?
• Why are they covering COVID 24/7 on every available outlet, drumming up the death tallies and case counts and behaving as if it were the only newsworthy story on the planet?
• Why are people all suddenly parroting the same phrases like “social distancing,” “New Normal,” “Build Back Better,” and the Orwellian double-think gem “together apart”?
• Why does it seem like everyone has suddenly lost their capacities for critical thinking, reasoning, logic, and scientific analysis?
• Why are they encouraging discrimination against those who refuse to comply with unscientific and nonsensical guidelines?
• Why did they turn the world into an open-air prison?
• Why are governments patterning their policies after Biderman’s Chart of Coercion?

• Why does it feel like we’re being subjected to a permanent Milgram Obedience–Stanford Prison–Asch Conformity experiment?
• Why are Big Tech and Big Media silencing people—especially scientists, physicians, and other knowledgeable individuals who are most qualified to speak about these matters?
• Why are California and the federal government threatening physicians with loss of their licenses for spreading “misinformation,” which happens to be based on scientifically demonstrable evidence and clinical experience?
• Why are such extreme measures being taken for a disease with an infinitesimal fatality rate that primarily only affects those who are already likely to die—namely the elderly and those with serious comorbidities?
• Why are governments rewriting human rights policies and revising statutes to allow the forced quarantining of healthy individuals?
• Why are ordinary, working-class Canadians who are bravely protesting authoritarian policies being vilified by the media and their leaders?

• Why are they pushing for International Health Regulations (IHR) amendments that would grant an unelected bureaucrat and accused genocidal war criminal control over the entire world’s public health policy?
• Why is the WHO drafting a pandemic accord that would give it the ability to set a “OneHealth” policy for all member states and seize supranational powers in times of declared public health “emergencies”?
• Why are Australians and New Zealanders being bullied, abused, arrested, and quarantined like they’re living in a police state?
• Why are so many colluders willingly serving as implements of tyranny?
• Why aren’t people worried that the ten stages of genocide are unfolding before our eyes?
• Why do people think relinquishing their liberties in exchange for “safety” is temporary when it has never been so in the past?
• Why are so many people belligerently bamboozled?
• Why are values such as independent thought, integrity, ethics, freedom, transparency, and individuality being denigrated while groupthink, obedience, complicity, prejudice, collectivism, fear, rage, and hatred are being promoted?
• Why are governments and employers mandating vaccines and pushing for vaxxports when they have been proven both unsafe and ineffective?
• Why does it feel like we’re living in a dystopian fairy tale?

HARMFUL & ILLOGICAL HEALTH POLICIES

• Why aren’t health authorities making dietary, lifestyle, and supplement recommendations that would bolster people’s immunity—like encouraging them to eat healthy; reduce their stress levels; get proper sleep; exercise; enjoy sunshine and fresh air; and practice other habits that help prevent illness?
• Why aren’t they focusing on the conventional practices for preventing respiratory illnesses such as washing your hands and staying home when you have symptoms?
• Why are we being commanded to “Trust the Science” when scientific inquiry is a continually evolving process and requires transparency and diverse viewpoints to progress?
• Why are they suddenly telling us asymptomatic spread exists, when there was no evidence for such transmission and no studies demonstrating that this has occurred with past coronaviruses?
• Why are they pretending like there’s no such thing as natural immunity?
• Why did they previously redefine “pandemic” to exclude “simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness”?
• Why did they change the definition of “herd immunity” to inject the idea that it is acquired through vaccination when it was previously understood by immunologists and virologists to be achieved naturally when a virus spreads throughout a community?
• Why did they change the definitions of “vaccine,” “fully vaccinated,” “cause of death,” and “case,” for that matter?
• Why did they censor Bakersfield doctors Dan Erickson and Artin Massihi when they provided sensible, experience-based, and reassuring textbook information about COVID transmission, treatment, and herd immunity at their April 22, 2020, press conference?

• Why are they using PCR tests to calculate case counts when their Nobel-Prize–winning creator said it “allows you to take a very minuscule amount of anything and make it measurable and then talk about it in meetings and stuff like it is important”?
• Why did Fauci—or as I like to call him, Dr. Mengelfauci—first tell the truth about masks not working, then lie about them working, and then say he lied when he’d originally told the long-established truth that masks are ineffective for respiratory viruses? And why did he lie about so many other things?
• Why are they telling us staying six feet apart will magically protect us?
• Why are they counting deaths with and not just from COVID?
• Why are they putting infected patients in nursing homes, where the population is the most vulnerable?
• Why are nursing home residents being isolated, tortured, neglected, eldercided with midazolam, and deprived of the visiting rights even prisoners enjoy?

• Why are they instituting policies the WHO previously warned against—from lockdowns to masking to disinfection to border closures—because they are known to cause mass-scale harm, poverty, and even death?
• Why are they closing schools (and later, pushing injections on kids) when children are at the least risk of contracting and spreading COVID?
• Why are they requiring children to mask, social-distance, and follow other ineffective rules that impair their development, inflict psychological and emotional damage, and even cause physical harm?
• Why are they continuing to use ventilation for COVID patients when it was found early on to be causing deaths?

• Why is so much data not shared or being hidden from the public?
• Why are they financially incentivizing the administration of a drug found to cause multiple-organ failure and with no clinical efficacy for COVID?
• Why are hospital staff getting away with “bagging” COVID patients with plastic equipment covers to “protect” the workers?

Mary Talley Bowden MD @MdBreatheMedical Center Hospital in Odessa TX bagged COVID patients to protect their staff. This went on for over year while doctors turned a blind eye. Powerful testimony from Dr Richard Bartlett in front of @Texas_Senate

July 2nd 20224,368 Retweets6,765 Likes

THWARTING OF EARLY TREATMENT PROTOCOLS

July 8, 2022 from libértame (set me free) comment at original translation thefreeonline

you left quietly Dear friend, leaving us sadness in your absence We owe you so much! On our side you were, down the unpleasant road, marking our footprints With your voice, with your pen; with your heart, you recorded them In the days of struggle, in the hours of pain, in the days of hope… (Pura Pérez to Lola Iturbe)

We define a militia woman as any armed woman who, as of 1936, participated directly in the combats of the Spanish Civil War or was trained and prepared for it in order to defend cities and towns.

Although some differences between these two groups of women remain to be identified, these women represented a change in the role of the sexes, not only in military terms, but above all in Spanish society.

The Spain of the 1930s was still very attached to the traditional conception of roles. Women were assigned to the domestic sphere, and poverty often brought them to the estates of large landowners, where they worked in agriculture or as a servant.

The start of the civil war in June 1936 then drastically changed the lives of many Spanish women. It was mainly the women of the cities who gave a new image of women. The first “Milicianas” (Women militia fighters) appeared on posters as a symbol of anti-fascist resistance.

These militia women, especially in the two largest organizations, the “anti-fascist women” and the “free women”, fought on the front lines alongside the men, although they also did what was traditionally considered “women’s work” there (cooking, cleaning , sewing, washing).

“You see, what the men did, we did too. If we also did some extra work like cleaning or cooking, we would stand guard right after like the men. And when we attacked, we attacked just like men. We did what was humanly possible, and some women did it even more than the men.” (Concha Perez Collado)

Analysis Of Investigative Reports on Military-Biological Activity Of USA and Allies In Ukraine And Other Regions

Military-Biological Activity Of USA In Ukraine from SouthFront 08.07.2022 via thefreeonline

On July 7, the Russian Ministry of Defence reported on the results of the analysis of the military-biological activity of the USA and its allies in Ukraine and other regions of the world. The report confirms that:

• Ukrainian special units were planning to use biological weapons in Eastern Ukraine;
• Ukrainian servicemen were involved as volunteers in experiments to assess the tolerance of dangerous infectious diseases;
• the official activities of the Pentagon in Ukraine are just a front for illegal military and biological research
• Ukraine and other post-Soviet states have become a testing ground for biological weapons not only for the USA, but also for its NATO allies
• the U.S. persists on its policy of building up its own military and biological capabilities in circumvention of international agreements.

Briefing on the results of analysing documents related to the military-biological activity of the USA in Ukraine on July 7:

The Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation continues analysing the military-biological activity of the USA and its allies in Ukraine and other regions of the world in view of new information received at the liberated territories and at the branch offices of the Defence Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) that form a unified information network.

We have previously stated that the Ukrainian project of the Pentagon do not meet the pertinent healthcare problems of Ukraine, while their implementation has not led to any improvement of the sanitary-epidemiological situation.

The special military operation has led to forming the final report on DTRA activity dated from 2005 to 2016.

The document contains the data on evaluation of healthcare, veterinary and biosecurity system efficiency prepared by a group of U.S. experts in 2016.

This report is a concept document designed for further planification of military-biological activity of the Pentagon in Ukraine that contains conclusions on implementation of the programme guidelines.

Despite the more than 10-year-long period of cooperation in the alleged ‘…reduction of biological threats…’, the experts have stated:

‘…There is no legislation on the control of highly dangerous pathogens in the country, there are significant deficiencies in biosafety… The current state of resources makes it impossible for laboratories to respond effectively to public health emergencies…’

The document emphasises that ‘…over the past five years, Ukraine has shown no progress in implementing international health regulations of the World Health Organisation’.

The report pays particular attention to non-compliance with biosafety requirements when working and storing microbial collections.

It has been stated ‘…that most facilities are characterised by numerous gross violations, such as unlocked fencing systems, unlatching windows, broken or inactive pathogen restriction systems, lack of alarm systems…’ The results of the review conclude that there is no system for protecting dangerous pathogens in Ukraine.

Beijing has reversed course on what would have been the country’s first vaccine mandate following popular outrage –

– from a Western Banned News Agency 8 July 22 via thefreeonline

© Getty Images / Kevin Frayer, shared with thanks

Beijing has ditched a proposed vaccination mandate that would have limited access to its public places to jabbed residents only, the city announced on Thursday, citing public pushback. The Chinese capital had only announced the rule on Wednesday.

Instead of requiring vaccination, Beijing residents can now enter all public venues with a negative Covid test result taken less than 72 hours ago and a temperature check, a city official told state media, adding that the government would continue to promote vaccination on a voluntary informed-consent basis.

Read more …US issues new China Covid-19 warning

Set to take effect on July 11, the policy would have barred the unvaxxed from theaters, museums, cinemas, gyms, training and tutoring locations, while medical staff, community service employees, home furnishing operators, express delivery providers, and conference attendees would not only have to get the shot but also receive a booster to continue in their jobs. 

While Li Ang of the Beijing Municipal Health Commission insisted there would be exceptions for those who don’t qualify for vaccination, many other countries whose governments initially promised similar exceptions failed to deliver. Nor would the mandate have gotten rid of the city’s testing rules, which require residents to be tested at least once every three days to enter public spaces.

Residents openly questioned the vaccine’s effectiveness against the Omicron variant on social media and denounced the proposed mandate as an illegal limitation on their freedom. A study conducted in Denmark showed both Pfizer and Moderna vaccines displayed a negative effectiveness against the Omicron variant just three months after being vaccinated, though the scientists did not test any of the Chinese Covid-19 vaccine formulas.

READ MORE: China announces another massive lockdown

“The reversal shows the power of public opinions,” former Global Times editor Hu Xijin noted on his official Weibo account after the rollback was announced, explaining that while “Chinese society is dominated by government,” they “backed down in the face of a public pushback. That means they accept the public’s view of the vaccine mandate as illegal.”

While 90% of China’s population are reportedly fully vaccinated, the mandate was partially intended to push older residents to get their shots – Beijing’s elderly vaccination rate is above 80%, but the continued reluctance of the remaining holdouts has irritated those who blame the unjabbed seniors for lockdowns and other inconvenient policies associated with the country’s zero-Covid strategy. 

The UN says nearly 7.1 million Somalis, almost half of the country’s population, face acute levels of food insecurity.

By Hamza Mohamed at Al Jazeera On 8 Jul 2022 via thefreeonline

Dayniile, Somalia – Faduma Hassan Mohamed has never witnessed a time like this.

When rains failed to fall as in previous years, she thought the river near her village of Buulo Warbo in Somalia’s southern Kuntunwarey district would not run dry.

• More than 200,000 face starvation in Somalia as rains fail: UN
• Hassan Mohamud: The second coming of Somalia’s new president
• Revisiting Somalia in the face of famine

First, the skies above became cloudless, she said, then the air hot and dry. Then the fertile soil below her feet that used to provide for her family turned into dark brown dust. Then the river dried up.

“We were farmers. We tended the land. We had a river and we used to water our crops with its water. We grew crops like maize and beans. Now, we [have] lost all of that,” the mother-of-six told Al Jazeera.

“There was no sign of rain in the sky and no water in the river. I can’t even remember the last time we harvested anything from the farm,” Faduma, who does not know her age, added.

Buulo Warbo, more than 140km (87 miles) southeast of the capital, Mogadishu, is in the Lower Shabelle region, one of the country’s breadbasket areas. The region used to produce food for Mogadishu. But after four failed rainy seasons, its people are on the move, trekking by foot towards the seaside capital.

Some have died on the way. Others, like Faduma, survived and sought refuge in a new IDP camp in the Dayniile area on the outskirts of Mogadishu. Two of her children are with her but the rest are with their grandmother.

Ecologistas en Acción (Federaciones) > Asturies > via thefreeonline

“El Gas No Es Solucion’ network celebrates, from July 8 to 10, its state meeting in the city of Xixón (pronounced Cheechone).

The Gas No Es Soluciones network celebrates, from July 8 to 10, its state meeting in the Asturian city pf Xixón.
Civil society organizations will be present to discuss and establish their strategy regarding fossil gas.
Open activities will be carried out against the opening of the illegal regasification plant in the port of El Musel.

‘The Gas No Es Soluciones’ network was created in 2018 to respond to the progress of gas infrastructures in Spanish territory.

It brings together more than 50 social organizations, citizen groups that fight against the development of gas infrastructures on the ground, environmental organizations, political formations and people from academia.

The so-called “natural” gas industry is taking advantage of the energy situation resulting from the war to promote new gas projects and reactivate others that organized citizens had managed to paralyze, such as the MidCat gas pipeline or the illegal regasification plant at El Musel port in Xixón.

For this reason, the organizations have decided to hold their annual state meeting in the Asturian city, in order to give voice to local problems and make it clear that gas is a fossil fuel and, as such, must be abandoned in order to meet the objectives of the Paris Agreement.

Fossil gas, in addition to emitting CO2, is responsible for much of the increase in global emissions of methane, a greenhouse gas 86 times more powerful than CO2.

Not reducing our use will only worsen an already critical situation.