One thing is for sure. He’s repeatedly changed his position on ‘the science,’ whether it’s on masks, lockdowns, social distancing, etc., he hasn’t been consistent in his stances on those things.
This amazing little clip of him and a bunch of different headlines put out by Big Media show how the ‘vaccine efficacy’ narrative has shifted.
Cutting off your Nose to Spite your Face? The US blocked China’s Solar panels after a False War Dept financed Report, crippling their own prospects of reaching Climate Goals as well as the US industry that supplied a rare quartz the Chinese needed to make the panels.
The US cannot readily make sufficient panels themselves as it will take years to develop the high-tech automized industry based in Xinjiang (impossible to work with forced labour), and US panels will be at least double the price, probably stalling the rollout.
The blatantly false pretext the US and its compromised ‘allies’ used to potentially wreck the global emissions-free electricity market was an ‘evidence free’ Report by the far-right “Horizon Advisory” consultancy, set up just for this purpose in 2020 and paid $278,000to accuse China of ‘forced labour’ in the booming solar panels industry in Xinjiang.
Despite their 750 Billion dollar a year budget the Defense Dept had the stunning arrogance to not even try to invent a convincing story, knowing that the entire MSM would repeat the lies anyway, even before the
report came out. A fact-free fantasy only comparable to Mike Pompeo accusing China of Genocide to slap on sanctions, merely on the word of the unhinged Adrian Zenz, a neo-Nazi crackpot in the employ of the US government, and the whole of the West followed suit.
Now on the eve of Cop26 they poisoned chances of a successful outcome by collapsing talks, accusing China for using more Coal.
And this even during sweeping power outages in China due to earlier cuts in coal usage. And even after China just announced it will close down its lucrative export industry of Coal-fired Power plants worldwide to support Climate change mitigation.
Xinjiang Daqo, a high-purity polysilicon manufacturer in Northwest China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, sought to debunk accusations of using “forced labor”, as it opened its doors to solar industry analysts from top financial institutions and journalists from English-language media.
Really wild stuff downtown. A Stop Asian Hate rally is clashing with a Pro-Uighur drive by. The pro-Uighur group is shouting “F— China!” The Asian rally is responding by calling them “racist.” pic.twitter.com/h8a2hB4Oqe
“Pure coincidence”“On July 19 a series of four flash explosions, followed by a fifth on July 20, ripped through the distillation unit of the 48,000 MT polysilicon plant of Xinjiang GCL, an indirect subsidiary of GCL-Poly Energy Holdings.Also, according to research notes of Roth Capital Partners quoted by pv magazine, a fire occurred at the polysilicon plant of Daqo New Energy on July 1, which has affected a production capacity of 6,000 metric tons (MT)”.
«Não vejo delegação para quatro patas. Não vejo um assento para as águias. Esquecemos e nos consideramos superiores. Mas, afinal, somos apenas parte da criação. E temos que considerar isso para entender onde estamos. E estamos parados em algum lugar entre a montanha e a formiga. Em algum lugar e apenas lá como parte integrante da criação. »
– Chefe Oren Lyons, Nação Seneca, em discurso para Organizações Não-Governamentais das Nações Unidas, Genebra, Suíça, 1977
«Os últimos 500 anos viram uma ‘reorganização rápida, contínua e radical da vida na Terra sem precedentes geológicos’ – a chegada do colonialismo europeu, o imperialismo e a expansão associada dos sistemas econômicos capitalistas levando à transferência de doenças, plantas, animais, formas de uso da terra e sistemas administrativos para todo o mundo.»
De acordo com a ONU, estamos entrando em uma «era de pandemia”» causada pelo desmatamento, perda de habitat, agricultura intensiva e tráfico…
Activists from the climate protest group, Extinction Rebellion, broke into the UK’s largest oil refinery early this morning and blockaded the entrance.
The people who none of us elect, who ultimately control international finance, all corporate & business activity, government policy and international relations have constructed a system that will enable them to seize the “global commons.”
They are the Global Public Private Partnership (GPPP) and while elected representatives are within their ranks, they don’t set either the agenda or policy.
We need to both recognise who the GPPP are and understand the implications of their gambit. How are this group of global stakeholders going to seize the global commons and why should we resist them?
……………
While we have been distracted and transitioned by the alleged global pandemic, or pseudopandemic, the Global Public Private Partnership (GPPP), who orchestrated the chaos, have been very busy. They have created the asset rating system that will afford them total, global economic control. This is based upon Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and utilises Stakeholder Capitalism Metrics (SCM).
This new global economic system is what the politicians mean by “build back better.” It is the essence of the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset.
Stakeholder Capitalism Metrics – SCM – were devised by the World Economic Forum, who describe themselves as the international organisation for public-private cooperation. When combined with the SDGs outlined in the UN Agenda 21 and 2030 frameworks, SCM enable the GPPP to seize the entire Earth, all its resources and everything on it, including us.
Lake Akgol in eastern Turkey’s Van Province on June 7. Typically home to thousands of birds, the lake dried up this summer. Ozkan Bilgin / Anadolu Agency via Getty Images
No nation in the Mediterranean region has been hit harder by climate change than Turkey. But as heat and drought increase, Turkey is doubling down on water-intensive agriculture and development and spurring a water-supply crisis that is expected to get much worse.
Across Turkey’s sprawling breadbasket, the Konya Basin, wheat withered and fields lay parched this year under the stress of the lowest rainfall in decades. In July, thousands of baby flamingos perished for lack of drinkable water, their corpses entombed in the dried, cracked mud.
Marx couldn’t see that his brilliant blueprint for communism was also a reflection of his own drive for supremacy, and the ‘necessity’ of centralized power could end up little different from centuries of dictatorship by crazed despots.
Against Marx: Did Bakunin predict the failure of the USSR?
The famous Russian anarchist saw in the postulates of Karl Marx a sure way towards the collapse of the very revolution that he sponsored.
Bakunin in a photograph by Félix Nadar, c. 1860 Public domain
Was the dictatorial socialism of the Soviet Union a logical consequence of the thought of Karl Marx? Much ink has been spent in answering that no, that the Rhenish philosopher was innocent of the excesses committed in his name.
From this point of view, Marx would be as little responsible for Stalinism as would Jesus Christ for the Crusades and the Inquisition. But … is the question really so clear?
When he founded the International Workers Association, the author of Capital confronted Mikhail Bakunin, the famous Russian anarchist. There was an ideological and personal struggle between them that would divide the labor movement.
Karl Marx
Faced with the hagiographies of Marx written by his supporters, beginning with Engels, Bakunin’s texts provide us with a penetrating and critical look at his person and his principles. With nuances, sometimes unsuspected.
This is not a gratuitous disqualification, but the testimony of a man who, in a sense, deeply admires his opponent. Bakunin has no problem recognizing Marx’s superior knowledge and the merit of a lifetime dedicated to the cause of revolution.
What he cannot bear is a mood that seemed to him all authoritarianism.
For the libertarian thinker, the great dream of the Marxists, the dictatorship of the proletariat, did not differ in practice from those it intended to replace: “Marx’s People’s State and Bismarck’s monarchical and aristocratic state are completely identical in terms of their fundamental internal and external objectives ”.
He believed that both the German Empire and the hypothetical workers’ state of the future would end up using force
It is a serious accusation. Why do you establish an equivalence between two apparently opposite political models?
Bakunin believed that both the German Empire and the hypothetical workers state of the future would eventually use force. Both would seek military expansionism and repress the masses whenever they threatened rebellion.
In both cases, the government would be based on the dominance of a minority over a majority.
A state, however much it called itself “popular,” always implied, according to Bakunin, that a few, theoretically better prepared, controlled a supposedly ignorant and incapable many.
Where Marx announced that social classes would cease to exist, he warned that a new ruling caste would form, oblivious to the concerns of ordinary people.
Marxism would cease to be a revolutionary doctrine to become an official and imposed truth, with which the possibility of a free discussion would be annulled.
The Free 