The streets of the main cities of territory dominated by the Chilean State, on a day like today, March 8, two years ago were filled with thousands of people who with colors, shouts, slogans, fire and barricades make visible and/or attacked to the macho scourge.
Today the streets are hardly filled with a few bodies. Many prefer to wait for the changes so promised by the new government, from the comfort of their homes, changes that promise to end heteropatriarchal machismo among the inhabitants of this territory.
The expectation for new public policies and reforms in “gender issues” has raised hope in a part of feminist groups and individuals, sexual dissidents and in practically all sectors sucks social democratic flags.
Unfortunately, the hopes and expectations were left only in that, because the heteropatriarchy will not end with any legal reform or with social aid.
Unfortunately, heteropatriarchy is part of the economic, social and cultural system that dominates us. It’s everywhere!
We find it in the way we see ourselves and each other. In the way we relate, in how they subject us, etc.
There is no being that is not affected by the patriarchy, but without a doubt, sexist attacks are not the same for men as for women or transsexuals, queers, queers, lesbians, without victimizing these last 5 are the most affected.
Today power dresses in fashion, takes on feminist and sexual dissidence outfits, and why wouldn’t it? If everyone has a place in the democratic party, everyone can be represented in the institutions, we can all have the same constitutional rights.
The powerful can take these or other clothes in order to perpetuate themselves in power, just as they can launch various initiatives to improve the living conditions of women and sexual dissidence, but the exercise of power, therefore, state domination will not end.
Changes in the way in which the powerful “humanize” subjugation or create a softer repressive apparatus or proclaim more inclusive laws for different groups, should not be part of the struggles of those who really want radical destruction in all forms of oppression.
For something to radically change everyone, we all have to act without delegates, or intermediaries, or waiting.
Today those who do not wait for others to break their chains, who here and now want to destroy the patriarchy, take to the streets.
Direct action against the sexists!
Let all institutions burn to the ground!
La lucha contra el Estado es parte de la lucha contra el patriarcado. Palabras de la compañera anarquista Mónica Caballero
Las calles de las principales ciudades de territorio dominado por el Estado chileno, en un día como hoy, 8 de marzo, hace dos años atrás se repletaban con miles de personas que con colores, gritos, consignas, fuego y barricadas visibilizan y/o atacaban a la lacra machista.
Hoy a penas las calles las llenan algunos cuerpos. Muchxs prefieren esperar los cambios tan prometidos por el nuevo gobierno, desde la comodidad de sus casas, cambios que prometen acabar con el machismo heteropatriarcal entre lxs habitantes de este territorio.
La expectación por las nuevas políticas publicas y las reformas en los “temas de genero” a levantado una esperanza en una parte de grupos e invidualidades feministas, disidentes sexuales y en prácticamente en todos los sectores chupa banderas socialdemócratas.
Las esperas y esperanzas lamentablemente quedaron solo en eso, porque el heteropatriarcado no se terminará con ninguna reforma legal o con ayudas sociales.
Lamentablemente el heteropatriarcado es parte del sistema económico, social y cultural que nos domina. ¡Esta en todas partes! Lo encontramos en la forma en el como nos vemos a nosotrxs mismxs y a lxs otrxs. En la manera de relacionarnos, en el cómo nos someten, etc.
No hay ser que no sea afectado por el patriarcado, pero sin lugar a duda a los ataques machistas no son iguales para hombres que para mujeres o transexuales, queers, maricas, lesbiana, sin victimizar estos 5 últimos son los mas afectadxs.
Hoy el poder se viste a la moda, toma atuendos feministas y de disidencias sexuales, ¿y porque no lo haría? Si todes tienen cabida en la fiesta democrática, todes pueden ser representades en las instituciones, todes podemos tener los mismos derechos constitucionales.
Lxs poderosxs pueden tomar estos u otros ropajes con tal de perpetuarse en el poder, como de la misma manera pueden levantar diversas iniciativas para mejorar las condiciones de vida de mujeres y disidencias sexuales, pero el ejercicio del poder por tanto la dominación estatal no terminará.
Los cambios en a forma en el como los poderosxs “humanizan” el sometimiento o crean un aparato represor mas blando o proclaman letes más inclusivas para distintos colectivos, no debería ser parte de las luchas de quienes quieren realmente la destrucción radical en todas las formas de opresión.
Para que algo cambie radicalmente todes, todas y todos tenemos que actuar sin delegadxs, ni intermediarixs, ni esperas.
Hoy salen a la calle quienes no se quedan a esperas a que otrxs les rompan las cadenas, quienes aquí y ahora quieren destruir el patriarcado.
¡Acción directa en contra del macho!
¡Que todas las instituciones arden hasta sus cimientos!
Reuters reports that Facebook and Instagram are now allowing calls for the death of Russians and Russian leaders in exemption from the platforms’ hate speech terms of service due to the war in Ukraine:
“Meta Platforms will allow Facebook and Instagram users in some countries to call for violence against Russians and Russian soldiers in the context of the Ukraine invasion, according to internal emails seen by Reuters on Thursday, in a temporary change to its hate speech policy.”
Twitter has also altered its rules against incitement and death threats in the case of Russian leaders and military personnel, as Ben Norton explains here for Multipolarista.
Last month we also learned that Facebook is now allowing users to praise the Ukrainian neo-Nazi Azov Battalion because of the war, a move that is arguably the most liberal thing that has ever happened.
On March 11, the Kremlin approved the involvement of foreign militants in military operations in Ukraine along with the joint Russian, DPR and LPR military. The decision was made in response to the massive recruitment of foreign fighters by the Kiev military officials.
Russian President Vladimir Putin approved the proposal to attract foreign volunteers in order to support DPR and LPR forces in the Donbass region during his meeting with permanent members of the Russian Security Council.
“As for the gathering of mercenaries from all over the world and sending them to Ukraine, we see that they do not hide it, the Western sponsors of Ukraine, the Ukrainian regime, do not hide it, they do it openly, ignoring all norms of international law,” Putin said during the meeting.
The press secretary of the Russian President Dmitry Peskov explained such a decision with the idea of strengthening of the DPR and LPR People’s Militias. There is also the Kremlin’s intention to show that there are those willing to fight along Russian forces against the Ukrainian nationalists, or more globally against the Western hegemony.
“In general, there is a flow of volunteers. There are mercenaries, a huge number of paid mercenaries who come to Ukraine to take part in hostilities against our (Russian) military. At the same time, applications are being received from volunteers who want to take part on a free basis in what, in their opinion, is actually a national liberation struggle,” the Kremlin spokesman said.
“This is what we are talking about. As the Western world welcomes the arrival of these motley mercenaries from different countries of the world, then there are volunteers from this side too. There are also volunteers who want to take part in this,” he added.
It was clarified that the matter is not about Russians, who would like to join the military, but mainly about those “who applied from the Middle East, including from Syria.”
Russian Defence Minister Sergey Shoigu indicated that the conscription of about 16,000 foreign volunteers was planned.
A unit of the Armed Forces of the Central African Republic has released a video saying that they are ready to fight with Russia against Ukrainian nationalists:
Video Player
00:0
The involvement of the foreign servicemen, including from Syria, in military activities in Ukraine may fasten the mopping-up operations in the currently blockaded cities, as they have the necessary experience after years of fighting against terrorists of all kinds in Syria.
At the same time, the Kremlin’s decision to deploy foreign militants on the Ukrainian battlefield may damage the Russian “military PR campaign”, as such a move may also be treated as indication that the Russian operations have stalled and new reinforcement is needed.
A report of the State Border Service of Ukraine about the arrival of foreign volunteers through the checkpoints of the Western Regional Administration. More than 170 foreigners arrived as volunteers.
A report of the State Border Service of Ukraine about the arrival of foreign volunteers through the checkpoints of the Western Regional Administration. More than 170 foreigners arrived as volunteers.
On the other hand, the Ukrainian side claimed that almost 20,000 foreign fighters from 52 countries had joined the fight against the “Russian aggressors”, according to the claims of the Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba made a week ago.
In order to prevent another plandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) wants to create an international “pandemic treaty” that would restrict and legally bind its 194 member nations to medical martial law.
The United States would need to give up its national sovereignty under the plan, including all civil and health rights. Every other country that is part of the United Nations would be expected to do the same (if they have not already).
Back in December, the World Health Assembly (WHA), the WHO’s 194-member health policy forum, agreed to initiate the process of drafting a pandemic treaty based on an already existing international legal instrument called the International Health Regulations (2005), also known as the IHR.
The stated purpose of the IHR is to: “Prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks, and which avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade.”
In the event that another deadly bioweapon gets released from one of the Pentagon’s bioweapons laboratories in Ukraine, for instance, then the WHO would have at its disposal far more authoritarian power to tyrannize people for their own “safety.”
“Indeed, it was in January 2020, that pursuant to article 12 of the IHR that the WHO Director-General (the ‘Director-General’) declared that the COVID-19 was a ‘public health emergency of international concern’ (a ‘PHEIC’), setting off a worldwide tidal wave of highly restrictive government health policies resulting in lockdowns, mandatory masking, social isolation, school and business closings, and eventually culminating in compulsory vaccination, contact tracing and testing, in some populations,” reported GreenMedInfo.
“This was all the more egregious as pertains the widespread push for mandatory vaccination given that the mRNA technology used in the COVID jabs are highly experimental, having never before been tested in human clinical trials for safety or effectiveness. Their coerced or mandated use therefore violate informed consent given that evidence-based risk/benefit information based on long-term safety trails are not yet available.”
Next Plandemic Will Be Even More Brutal Than The Last One
The WHA’s decision late last year was, in fact, adopted as schemed. They called the dystopian move “The World Together,” and it is set to be implemented under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution some time in 2024.
Once that happens, the WHA will have the authority to adopt new conventions or agreements with respect to any matter deemed to be “within the competence of the Organization.”
A simple two-thirds vote is enough to make such changes on a whim, and all member countries will have to abide by whatever gets passed.
Keep in mind that this special session of the WHA is only the second to ever have occurred since 1948 when it was founded. This was the same year, by the way, that the modern-day nation-state of Israel was declared into existence.
On March 3, the WHA already announced changes to implement a “new global public health world order” that basically globalizes how governments respond to plandemic. The Fauci Flu appears to have just been a test run, as miserable as it was, the next one will be even more brutal.
“If you believe in bodily sovereignty, parental rights and informed consent, you must stand up now and let your voice be heard,” said popular health guru Sayer Ji.
As the Financial Times generally sees itself as the in-house newspaper of the boss class here in the UK, then it’s sometimes worthwhile dipping in to see exactly what our class enemy is up to.
‘The comforting euphemism that the British police are there to “keep the peace” disguises a harder reality: that their paramount role is to maintain the state’s monopoly of the use of force.’